{"report_id":207,"form_id":"23","user_id":81,"organization_id":10,"question_id":"116","question_type":"Free_Text","text_answer":"All clients in the home had their needs assessed by MnCHOICES, which supported the individuals having sleep staff as well as alone time. The provider had seen this house as a potential house to replace overnight staff with remote monitoring technology due to the low needs of the individuals. The provider\u2019s push for more alone time and remote monitoring was impacted by their efforts to allow the dignity of risk by providing more opportunities for people they serve to have a choice and control over their lives.  The effort to encourage dignity of risk was influenced by statewide person-centered planning requirements and emphasis. However, one guardian was resistant to remote monitoring but compromised by allowing the person alone time in their plan.  It was common knowledge among staff that the clients demonstrated low needs, contributing to the staff feeling comfortable to lie down.","created_by":81,"updated_by":81,"updated_at":"5\/26\/2021 4:37:05 pm","created_at":"5\/26\/2021 4:37:05 pm","id":37408}