{"report_id":245,"form_id":"22","user_id":81,"organization_id":13,"question_id":"347","question_type":"Free_Text","text_answer":"Learning Point 1:  Contributing factors that further supported the agency's threshold for placement not being met in this case included the fact that the child was not actively suicidal and a hospital was not recommending placement at the time of the request.  Furthermore, the agency believed the child's needs were being met through his engagement with other service providers.  \r\n\r\nLearning Point 1:  The child was involved with several service providers and none indicated that the child was actively suicidal, including a therapist who likely completed a safety plan with the child and his family.  The staff's mental model was such that the child's needs were being met by the service providers he was engaged with; therefore, justifying the decision to not complete a safety plan.  Safety precautions were also implemented in the home following the child's previous suicide attempt.","created_by":81,"updated_by":81,"updated_at":"5\/26\/2021 10:02:03 am","created_at":"5\/26\/2021 10:02:03 am","id":27216}