The worker indicated there was no discussion of licensing father #2 for the non-biological child in his care or Northstar funding because the worker didn't think this was possible since father #2 was undocumented and didn't qualify for a lot of resources.  Further supporting the decision to not explore licensing was that Father #2 was also not requesting any financial assistance for any of the children in his care, and the children were under the care of father #2 through a family arrangement prior to the case going to court. Also influencing the decision to not explore licensing the home of father #2was that the 13-year old child considered father #2 his father.