LP1: The supervisor supported the staff by taking the 2/3/2017 CP intake off the staff's workload and the staff believed the report was screened timely within the 24 hour timeline. 
LP2: Supporting the consultation between agency staff was the belief that not every licensing violation is a CP report, as well as, the perception that the CP system would be inundated if every incident was reported.  
Further supporting a CP report being made on June 7, 2017 for an incident that occurred on May 2, 2017 was the fact that the foster mother reported that she was having a freezer delivered that day and the delivery people were coming in and out of the house, making the door alarm go off each time. The foster mother did shut the door behind the delivery people when it was left open as they went in and out. At the time, she was also vacuuming the house to get ready for the foster child's parents to come for a visit. Given this information, the staff's perception was that the safety risk did not reach the threshold of needing to make a CP report, and the child escaping outside when the door was left open was considered to be accidental in nature.