{"report_id":299,"form_id":"22","user_id":81,"organization_id":13,"question_id":"318","question_type":"Free_Text","text_answer":"The worker reported that she had difficulty getting a hold of the mother by phone after the report came in and ended up doing a drop-in visit. Due to this, the worker had to balance making timelines with ensuring all parties were present for a visit. Worker stated that the mother and the three children were at the home, however the father was not home at the initial visit. Five days later, a new CP report dated 7\/29\/2016 came in. As a result of this domestic violence incident, the father to the Subject Child was arrested. The worker sent letters to the Subject Child's mother and father. The letter to the father requested that he call the worker back to discuss the two CP reports. The worker reported that by the time she was able to have a face to face with the Subject Child's mother again regarding the new CP report, the father had been released from jail and his whereabouts were unknown. The Subject Child's mother reported that she and the Subject Child's father were not together. The Subject Child's mother also reported that he did not have a cell phone that she could reach him at. The worker also asked the Subject Child's mother to have the father get a hold of her.\r\n\r\nThe worker had many years of experience and history working with domestic violence cases. This experience found the worker needing to reconcile truths about the DV incident, resulting in the worker making a trade-off between developing and supporting engagement with the mother of the children while working to ensure the children's well-being and continuing to locate and meet with the father.","created_by":81,"updated_by":81,"updated_at":"5\/26\/2021 11:42:17 am","created_at":"5\/26\/2021 11:42:17 am","id":31004}