•	In 2016, SSIS did not have an override/underride feature incorporated within the safety and risk assessments. Currently this is an available option. 
•	Worker had 20+ years of experience working CP investigations
•	The mother's reaction was cooperative and protective. Mother is able and willing to keep her kids safe. Mother is a safe caregiver. 
•	She followed recommendations of no contact/Domestic Abuse No Contact Order (DANCO)
•	Half-sister did not report witnessing violence; had heard yelling between the adults
•	Mother had family support network in the area
•	Previous maltreatment determination was made against the half-sister's biological father, not the subject child's father. 
•	Father compliant with Probation Officer and was making impressive strides at completing required programming. He was doing well. 
o	Father comply with no contact, was not living at the home
o	Father was engaged in DBT therapy and domestic violence programming 
o	Father was sober/ clear UA's
o	County Attorney would likely not accept CHIPS petition due to all the services family receiving and completing successfully 
•	Judge made decision to lift the DANCO
•	Consult with Supervisor and support decision to close without opening ongoing CP case management
o	SDM Tool is used more for discussion during supervisory consult at CP Inv. closing for worker with more experience. Safety Assessment results were either safe/conditionally safe 
o	Tools are prescriptive/ black and white, but child protection practice is very gray