{"id":279,"form_id":"22","user_id":"92","question_id":null,"organization_id":"13","tab_id":null,"question_type":null,"text_answer":"{\"Multiple_Choice__291\":\"Kristine Frick\",\"Short_Answer__292\":\"Triage Team\",\"Date__293\":\"05\\\/01\\\/2017\",\"Multiple_Choice__294\":\"Fatality\",\"Yes_or_No__295\":\"No\",\"Multiple_Choice__300\":\"8\",\"Multiple_Choice__301\":\"Hennepin\",\"Short_Answer__303\":\"Emersyn\",\"Short_Answer__304\":\"Morris\",\"Date__305\":\"03\\\/23\\\/2016\",\"Date__306\":\"08\\\/13\\\/2016\",\"Multiple_Choice__308\":\"4 Months\",\"Multiple_Choice__309\":\"1\",\"Short_Answer__310\":\"Father\",\"Multiple_Choice__346\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__348\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__350\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__352\":\"2\",\"Free_Text__353\":\"1.) After receiving and screening in an initial CP intake\\\/child maltreatment report regarding the critical incident, subsequent intakes regarding the critical incident (duplicates) were received by the local agency. These duplicate CP intakes\\\/child maltreatment reports were screened out and referred to the staff working the CP investigation. Screening duplicate intakes out instead of screening them in was not in compliance with intake, screening and response path guidance at the time, however, was a modified practice the local agency had become accustomed to, as SSIS allowed this option in the dropdown for local agencies to choose disposition when screening.  The local agency choose SSIS option to Screen out with reason being: Duplicate report; physical abuse allegations are already being assessed.   \\r\\n\\r\\n2.)  The auto generated *CPS Summary Disposition Notice* letter sent to mandated reporters following the local agency's decision to screen out, which is found in SSIS under CP Intake chronology, documents -  read: \\r\\nAddressed to the mandated reporter,  \\r\\n\\u00e2\\u20ac\\u0153Thank you for providing your concerns of suspected maltreatment of ____Name included is of the mother - not the subject child____. We did not conduct an investigation because the information provided did not meet the definition of physical abuse, sexual abuse, or neglect under Child Protection Statutes. If you become aware of additional information regarding this situation please contact the agency again. \\r\\nThank you for your interest and concern for children. Please continue to report any situations of suspected child maltreatment to Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Department at 612-348-3000.\",\"Multiple_Choice__354\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__356\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__368\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__358\":\"2\",\"Free_Text__359\":\"State policy is that duplicate reports be screened in and referred to the already open assessment\\\/investigation workgroup. Hennepin County's practice in this case was to screen out the duplicate reports. \\r\\nRelevant to multiple Child maltreatment reports that were screened out in this case, under the Dispositions\\\/Screening decision reads: Screened out - duplicate report; physical abuse allegations are already being assessed.\\r\\nAfter receiving and screening in an initial CP intake\\\/child maltreatment report regarding the critical incident, subsequent intakes regarding the critical incident (duplicates) were received by the local agency. These duplicate CP intakes\\\/child maltreatment reports were screened out and referred to the staff working the CP investigation.\",\"Multiple_Choice__360\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__362\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__364\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__366\":\"2\",\"Free_Text__367\":\"Screening duplicate intakes out instead of screening them in was not in compliance with intake, screening and response path guidance at the time, however, was a modified practice the local agency had become accustomed to.\",\"Yes_or_No__370\":\"Yes\"}","mcq_answer":null,"other_answer":"0","status":"1","created_by":"92","updated_by":81,"created_at":"5\/26\/2021 2:33:23 pm","updated_at":"5\/26\/2021 11:16:40 am","deleted_at":null,"report_name":"Emersyn Morris"}