{"report_id":321,"form_id":"22","user_id":81,"organization_id":13,"question_id":"319","question_type":"Free_Text","text_answer":"Cross reporting to LE not occurring was influenced by LE coordination, workload and technology. It was learned that due to the size of the local agency and having multiple LE jurisdictions within it, there is often times uncertainty on jurisdictions and coverage for geographical areas. This makes it inherently difficult to identify where a report is supposed to be sent. This, coupled with the Governor's Task Force creating heightened expectations that screen-outs be cross-reported, led to staffing levels and capacity being an issue for LE to follow up on those cross-reports. Due to this reduction in capacity, some police departments were not assigning screened-out cross reports for follow up. Furthermore, LE indicated that they did not want them in the first place as their perception about screened out reports is that if CP doesn't take action, that LE won't either. This resulted in a lower priority being placed on these reports in general. \r\n\r\nStaffing levels at the local agency also impacted cross-reporting practices. Due to turnover and staffing levels, intake workers are often times working multiple intakes at a time. Each intake takes over 300 clicks to complete within SSIS and is very time consuming for intake staff. Prioritization for some intakes (more egregious) create the situation where staff are working different reports at the same time, thus increasing the risk of not being able to fulfill the cross-report mandate. Additionally, the agency prides itself on less than a 5 minute wait time for reporters as they want the community and mandated reports to continue making reports and not be discouraged when not being able to connect with an intake worker in a timely manner.","created_by":81,"updated_by":81,"updated_at":"5\/26\/2021 1:08:33 pm","created_at":"5\/26\/2021 1:08:33 pm","id":33038}