{"report_id":258,"form_id":"22","user_id":81,"organization_id":13,"question_id":"359","question_type":"Free_Text","text_answer":"This resulted from changes in government regulation, such as the implementation of the Governor's Task Force recommendations. These recommendations created changes to the Intake, Screening and Response Path guidelines, further increasing the number of 24 hour response cases the agency needed to respond to.\r\n\r\nFurther supporting staff's need to prioritize immediate response cases is that Minnesota State Statute 626.556, subd. 10(j) governs immediate response timeframes for predatory offenders and is based on allegations versus actual risk to the alleged victim. As a result of this statute and since funding is tied to compliance with this measure, staff don't have discretion to respond to alleged victims based upon actual risk and are forced to respond based on allegation type and need to prioritize these cases over ones that come in as a 5 day response which may actually be at greater risk in some cases.","created_by":81,"updated_by":81,"updated_at":"5\/26\/2021 10:36:58 am","created_at":"5\/26\/2021 10:36:58 am","id":28246}