{"id":274,"form_id":"22","user_id":"91","question_id":null,"organization_id":"13","tab_id":null,"question_type":null,"text_answer":"{\"Multiple_Choice__291\":\"Brittany Lochner\",\"Short_Answer__292\":\"Meg Carriveau\",\"Date__293\":\"07\\\/24\\\/2017\",\"Multiple_Choice__294\":\"Fatality\",\"Yes_or_No__295\":\"No\",\"Multiple_Choice__300\":\"4\",\"Multiple_Choice__301\":\"Insanti\",\"Short_Answer__303\":\"Eli\",\"Short_Answer__304\":\"Arispe-Hentges\",\"Date__305\":\"02\\\/03\\\/2017\",\"Date__306\":\"04\\\/05\\\/2017\",\"Date__307\":\"2017-04-05 00:00:00\",\"Multiple_Choice__308\":\"2 Months\",\"Multiple_Choice__309\":\"2\",\"Short_Answer__310\":\"Mother\",\"Short_Answer__311\":\"Father\",\"Multiple_Choice__316\":\"1\",\"Short_Answer__317\":\"Services to address concerns noted in the PSOP referral were not documented in the SSIS case file.\",\"Free_Text__318\":\"No human factors debriefing completed\",\"Free_Text__319\":\"The local agency's norm is to document at the bottom of the intake how the case met the eligibility requirements (i.e. identified risk factors) for PSOP services.  Specifically, the agency documented mental health concerns, chemical dependency needs, and concerns with the mother's parenting as eligibility requirements.  PSOP eligibility requirements do not dictate services provided due to risk factors not needing to be present at the time of the referral.  Impacting the agency not documenting services to address concerns noted in the PSOP referral were that the foster family did not indicate current chemical dependency concerns, the PSOP worker was unaware that the mother was actively using at the time of the referral, and the worker's mental model was such that public health was working with the mother to address parenting needs.  PSOP is also a client driven service and at the time of the referral, the mother only identified housing as the need, which further supported the worker focusing on the mother's self-identified need rather than the risk factors identified for eligibility.  The agency's normative practice of utilizing PSOP as an engagement strategy to voluntarily work with families further supported the worker prioritizing the mother's need for housing.  \\r\\n\\r\\nServices not being documented in the PSOP case file were influenced by the agencies need to prioritize working with involuntary cases over voluntary cases as a result of an overall increase in staff's caseload.  As a result of federal and state child protection mandates, involuntary cases take precedence over voluntary cases, which is normative practice for all counties in Minnesota.  The rise in caseload size has been impacted by the local agency receiving more child welfare reports resulting in an overall increase of screened in reports.  The surge in volume of calls, screened in reports, and increased case load size at the local agency has been effected by the recent revisions to the Minnesota Intake, Screening, and Response Path Guidelines.  These changes resulted from new legislation following the recommendations made by the Governor's Task Force on the Protection of Children.  Furthermore, staff turnover influenced the prioritization of involuntary cases over voluntary cases within the agency, such as PSOP cases which have fewer federal and state regulatory restrictions.\",\"Multiple_Choice__346\":\"2\",\"Free_Text__347\":\"PSOP is a client driven service and at the time of the referral, the mother only identified housing as the need, which further supported the worker focusing on the mother's self-identified need rather than the risk factors identified for eligibility.\",\"Multiple_Choice__348\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__350\":\"3\",\"Free_Text__351\":\"The local agency's norm is to document at the bottom of the intake how the case met the eligibility requirements (i.e. identified risk factors) for PSOP services.  Specifically, the agency documented mental health concerns, chemical dependency needs, and concerns with the mother's parenting as eligibility requirements.  PSOP eligibility requirements do not dictate services provided due to risk factors not needing to be present at the time of the referral.  Impacting the agency not documenting services to address concerns noted in the PSOP referral were that the foster family did not indicate current chemical dependency concerns, the PSOP worker was unaware that the mother was actively using at the time of the referral, and the worker's mental model was such that public health was working with the mother to address parenting needs.  PSOP is also a client driven service and at the time of the referral, the mother only identified housing as the need, which further supported the worker focusing on the mother's self-identified need rather than the risk factors identified for eligibility.  In addition, services not being documented in the PSOP case file were influenced by the agencies need to prioritize working with involuntary cases over voluntary cases as a result of an overall increase in staff's caseload.\",\"Multiple_Choice__352\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__354\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__356\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__368\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__358\":\"2\",\"Free_Text__359\":\"PSOP cases have fewer federal and state regulatory restrictions.\",\"Multiple_Choice__360\":\"2\",\"Free_Text__361\":\"As a result of federal and state child protection mandates, involuntary cases take precedence over voluntary cases, which is normative practice for all counties in Minnesota.  The agency needed to prioritize working with involuntary cases over voluntary cases as a result of an overall increase in staff's caseload.  The rise in caseload size has been impacted by the local agency receiving more child welfare reports resulting in an overall increase of screened in reports.  The surge in volume of calls, screened in reports, and increased case load size at the local agency has been effected by the recent revisions to the Minnesota Intake, Screening, and Response Path Guidelines.  These changes resulted from new legislation following the recommendations made by the Governor's Task Force on the Protection of Children.  Furthermore, staff turnover influenced the prioritization of involuntary cases over voluntary cases within the agency, such as PSOP cases which have fewer federal and state regulatory restrictions.\",\"Multiple_Choice__362\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__364\":\"0\",\"Multiple_Choice__366\":\"0\"}","mcq_answer":null,"other_answer":"0","status":"1","created_by":"91","updated_by":81,"created_at":"5\/26\/2021 2:33:23 pm","updated_at":"5\/26\/2021 11:06:34 am","deleted_at":null,"report_name":"Eli Arispe-Hentges"}