{"report_id":282,"form_id":"22","user_id":81,"organization_id":13,"question_id":"347","question_type":"Free_Text","text_answer":"The remaining child not being added to the TPR petition was influenced by the agency considering best interests of the child, the child's healthy condition and also local and state guidance. When the subject child was seen for her critical incident, the hospital identified that this child needed immediate care or the child would die. As a result of this, the subsequent Child Protection (CP) report, and allegations, only pertained to the subject child. The resulting investigation then focused on the critically ill child. At the initial home visit done to assess and assure safety of the reaming child, it was staff's perception that this child was healthy. Further  supporting the worker's assessment of safety for the sibling child was that Law Enforcement (LE) did not place that child on a hold, creating a presumption of safety for that child.","created_by":81,"updated_by":81,"updated_at":"5\/26\/2021 11:19:27 am","created_at":"5\/26\/2021 11:19:27 am","id":29862}