{"report_id":248,"form_id":"22","user_id":92,"organization_id":13,"question_id":"318","question_type":"Free_Text","text_answer":"\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2\tIn 2016, SSIS did not have an override\/underride feature incorporated within the safety and risk assessments. Currently this is an available option. \r\n\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2\tWorker had 20+ years of experience working CP investigations\r\n\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2\tThe mother's reaction was cooperative and protective. Mother is able and willing to keep her kids safe. Mother is a safe caregiver. \r\n\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2\tShe followed recommendations of no contact\/Domestic Abuse No Contact Order (DANCO)\r\n\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2\tHalf-sister did not report witnessing violence; had heard yelling between the adults\r\n\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2\tMother had family support network in the area\r\n\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2\tPrevious maltreatment determination was made against the half-sister's biological father, not the subject child's father. \r\n\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2\tFather compliant with Probation Officer and was making impressive strides at completing required programming. He was doing well. \r\no\tFather comply with no contact, was not living at the home\r\no\tFather was engaged in DBT therapy and domestic violence programming \r\no\tFather was sober\/ clear UA's\r\no\tCounty Attorney would likely not accept CHIPS petition due to all the services family receiving and completing successfully \r\n\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2\tJudge made decision to lift the DANCO\r\n\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2\tConsult with Supervisor and support decision to close without opening ongoing CP case management\r\no\tSDM Tool is used more for discussion during supervisory consult at CP Inv. closing for worker with more experience. Safety Assessment results were either safe\/conditionally safe \r\no\tTools are prescriptive\/ black and white, but child protection practice is very gray","created_by":92,"updated_by":92,"updated_at":"6\/1\/2021 2:07:29 pm","created_at":"6\/1\/2021 2:07:29 pm","id":43187}